Butyl acrylate and polyurethane in the adhesive cost comparison

In the adhesive industry, the cost of materials is one of the core issues of concern to enterprises. Butyl acrylate and polyurethane are two common bonding materials that differ significantly in performance, use, and cost. This paper will analyze the cost comparison of butyl acrylate and polyurethane in adhesive from the perspectives of raw material cost, production cost and application cost.

1. raw material cost comparison

The cost of raw materials is the primary factor in determining the price of adhesives. The production of n-butyl acrylate mainly depends on propylene and n-butanol, both of which have sufficient production and relatively stable prices in China. In recent years, due to the improvement of propylene production process, its market price has been kept at a low level, thereby reducing the production cost of n-butyl acrylate.

In contrast, the main raw materials of polyurethane are isocyanate and polyol. The technical threshold for the production of isocyanates is high, and the market supply is relatively concentrated, with large price fluctuations. The procurement cost of polyols is also high, especially in the context of stricter environmental protection policies, the price of raw materials has further increased. Therefore, n-butyl acrylate is more advantageous in terms of raw material cost.

Question: What is the cost comparison between butyl acrylate and polyurethane in adhesives? From the perspective of raw material cost, the cost of n-butyl acrylate is more controllable, while the raw material price of polyurethane fluctuates greatly and the cost is higher.

2. production cost comparison

Production costs include equipment investment, energy consumption and labor costs. The production process of n-butyl acrylate is relatively simple, the equipment investment is low, and the energy consumption of the production process is small. The reaction conditions of n-butyl acrylate are mild, and the requirements for the production environment are not high, which further reduces the production cost.

The production process of polyurethane is more complex, involving multi-step chemical reactions, and requires high equipment and technology. Especially in the process of preparing isocyanates, high temperature and pressure and strict reaction control are required, which increases energy consumption and labor costs. Polyurethane production also requires the use of catalysts and other additives, which increase overall production costs.

Therefore, in terms of production cost, the advantage of n-butyl acrylate is more obvious, while the production cost of polyurethane is relatively high.

3. Application Cost Comparison

The application cost is mainly reflected in the construction and maintenance of the adhesive. n-Butyl acrylate has excellent adhesive properties and is suitable for a variety of substrates, including plastics, metals and wood. The curing time is short, the construction efficiency is high, and the dependence on the environment is low, which reduces the additional cost in the construction process.

Although polyurethane has high strength and durability, it requires strict environmental control, such as temperature and humidity, during the construction process. These additional construction requirements add time and labor costs. Polyurethanes may release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during use, with potential impacts on the health of construction workers and the environment, requiring additional protective measures and cost inputs.

From the perspective of application cost, the construction of n-butyl acrylate is simpler and more economical, while the application cost of polyurethane is higher.

4. environmental protection cost comparison

With the increasingly stringent environmental regulations, the cost of environmental protection has become an important factor that can not be ignored. The production process of n-butyl acrylate is relatively clean and has less pollution to the environment during use. The waste treatment of n-butyl acrylate is relatively simple, which meets the requirements of environmental protection and reduces the environmental protection expenditure of enterprises.

Polyurethane may release harmful substances during production and use, especially at high temperatures or in closed environments. These substances are not only harmful to the environment, but also may pose a threat to the health of construction workers, thus increasing the cost of environmental protection. The treatment of polyurethane waste is also more complex and needs to meet strict environmental protection standards, further increasing the cost of environmental protection.

Therefore, in terms of environmental protection costs, n-butyl acrylate has more advantages, while polyurethane has higher environmental protection costs.

5. comprehensive comparison and summary

On the whole, the cost comparison of n-butyl acrylate and polyurethane in adhesives is mainly reflected in four aspects: raw materials, production, application and environmental protection. Butyl acrylate has significant advantages in raw material cost, production cost and application cost, and has better environmental performance. Polyurethane is more competitive in certain high-end applications (such as high-performance waterproof materials). Although the cost is higher, its performance advantages may bring higher added value.

Question: What is the cost comparison between butyl acrylate and polyurethane in adhesives? In general, the cost advantage of n-butyl acrylate is more obvious, especially in the low-end adhesive market. The cost of polyurethane is higher, but its high performance makes it irreplaceable in certain fields.

When choosing adhesive materials, companies need to comprehensively consider cost, performance and application requirements to make a more economical and reasonable choice.